VIDEO LECTURE
COMMENTS
Feel free to leave any comments on the lesson - your views, improvements, mistakes, clarification of concepts, or vote to have this lesson revised. |
LESSON
Usually, it is impractical to obtain the value of the double integral by evaluating the limit, the right hand side of the equation,
We need a more direct way to evaluate this double integral which will use a new technique of integration when dealing with two variable functions. Recall that the partial derivatives of a function f(x,y) are calculated by holding one of the variables fixed and differentiating with respect to the other variable. Imagine that we will do this process, but in reverse, and call it partial integration. The symbol
is a partial definite integral with respect to x. It is evaluated by holding y fixed and integrating with respect to x, treating y is a constant. Likewise, the partial definite integral with respect to y,
is evaluated by holding x fixed and integrating with respect to y. Let us see this partial integration in action on the same function f(x,y) but first with respect to x and then with respect to y.
You may have already notice that we get different results depending of which term with we integrate with respect to. An integral of the form We anticipate that our two single integrations will be done either as
For the first form, the inside integration, We want to evaluate the expression,
We integrate the function, in this case
We round up by formally stating a theorem with links the double integral we initially wanted to find out with the two single partial integrations. Let R be the rectangle defined by the inequalities
This theorem allows us to evaluate a double integral over a rectangle by calculating an iterated integral. Moreover, the theorem tells us that the order of the integration does not matter. Now, listen very carefully. This is only applicable over rectangular regions as specified by the limits x = a to x = b and y = c to y = d. As we shall later see, the order of integration is in fact important when dealing with nonrectangular regions, which comprises a large proportional of our subsequent lessons. While, we shall not following proof the theorem, we can use a geometrical argument for the case where f(x,y) is nonnegative on R. If f(x,y) is nonnegative on R, the double integral
represents the volume of the solid S bounded above by the surface z=f(x,y) and below by the rectangle R. However, as one may notice, we may also write the volume of the solid S as
where A(y) represents the area of the cross section of the perpendicular to the y-axis taken at the point y. So, how might we compute the cross-sectional area A(y). This is the usual single variable integration problem. We fix y in the interval
Thus,
Substituting this expression into our volume equation gives us
We may also obtain the volume of solid S by using cross sections perpendicular to the x-axis. Using the similar formula,
where this time A(x) is the area of the cross section perpendicular to the x-axis taken at the point x. Using a similar process, we fix x in the interval
Substituting this expression into our volume equations gives us
Since the volume of S is also given by the double integral
which is what we initially set out to show. All information presentated, less questions and exercises, is original content of Donny, with slight references to various books.
Video courtesy of YouTube.com service. |